From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winfield v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Sep 14, 1976
541 S.W.2d 572 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 10067.

September 14, 1976.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, SCOTT COUNTY, STANLEY A. GRIMM, SPECIAL JUDGE.

Anthony J. Heckemeyer, Sikeston, for movant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BILLINGS, C. J., and STONE and TITUS, JJ.


Movant Larry Winfield's grounds for post-conviction relief from a sentence for rape — that his plea of guilty was involuntary and he did not have effective assistance of counsel — are refuted by his guilty plea transcript. Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 (Mo. banc 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911, 95 S.Ct. 832, 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975); Hogshooter v. State, 514 S.W.2d 109 (Mo.App. 1974).

The trial court did not err in denying the Rule 27.26 motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing.

All concur.


Summaries of

Winfield v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Sep 14, 1976
541 S.W.2d 572 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Winfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WINFIELD, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District

Date published: Sep 14, 1976

Citations

541 S.W.2d 572 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Wimberly v. State

The court's patient and thoroughgoing conduct of the hearing and evident concern to see that accused was…