From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winfield v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00636 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-00636 KJN P.

July 23, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 1, 2009, plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On July 7, 2010, plaintiff filed a document in which he seeks to add "Guard Hymen" as a defendant, claiming she committed slander against plaintiff. However, the sole allegation contained in plaintiff's filing is that while plaintiff was allegedly held down and administered psychotropic drugs, Guard Hymen allegedly held a gun on plaintiff from the gun tower. This allegation does not support a claim for slander, and plaintiff has alleged no constitutional violation against Guard Hymen. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 7, 2010 request is denied without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 43.)


Summaries of

Winfield v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00636 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Winfield v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:PAUL WINFIELD, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 23, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-00636 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)