From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winfield v. General

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. 2:08-cv-00407-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-00407-MCE-GGH P.

May 27, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 25, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Winfield v. General

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. 2:08-cv-00407-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Winfield v. General

Case Details

Full title:PAUL WINFIELD, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-00407-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)