From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT

01-04-2012

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PROXIMO SPIRITS, INC., a Delaware corporation; AGAVERA CAMICHINES, S.A. DE C. v. , a Mexico corporation; and DOES 1-25, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP D. GREGORY DURBIN HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. PETER HARVEY NAOMI JANE GRAY MATTHEW A. STRATTON DONALD A. THOMPSON By: D. Peter Harvey Attorneys for Plaintiff, E. & J. Gallo Winery SIERRA IP GROUP MARK D. MILLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB MICHAEL ASCHEN ANTHONY A. COPPOLA By: Anthony A. Coppola Attorneys for Defendants, Proximo Spirits, Inc., and Agavera Camichines, S.A. de C.V..


D. GREG DURBIN (SBN 81749)

McCORMICK BARSTOW SHEPPARD

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712)

NAOMI JANE GRAY (SBN 230171)

MATTHEW A. STRATTON (SBN 254080)

HARVEY SISKIND LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery

and Counterdefendants Ecco Domani USA, Inc. and Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V.

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Before: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery ("Gallo"), Counterdefendants Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V. and Ecco Domani USA, Inc. (collectively, "Counterdefendants"), and Defendants and Counterclaimants Proximo Spirits, Inc. ("Proximo") and Agavera Camichines, S.A. de C.V. ("Agavera Camichines") (collectively, "Counterclaimants"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the parties filed motions for summary judgment on December 9, 2011, and

WHEREAS the parties' papers opposing each others' motions for summary judgment are currently due on January 10, 2012, and

WHEREAS the parties agree that additional time to prepare reply briefs on the pending motions would be beneficial to both sides, and both sides are willing to create that additional time, while retaining the existing deadline for reply briefs, by advancing the filing date for opposition papers.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT

1. The parties' papers opposing each others' motions for summary judgment shall be filed and served on January 6, 2011.

2. The deadline for the parties to file and serve their reply papers in further support of their own motions for summary judgment shall be unchanged, i.e., it shall remain January 17, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

McCORMICK BARSTOW LLP

D. GREGORY DURBIN

HARVEY SISKIND LLP

D. PETER HARVEY

NAOMI JANE GRAY

MATTHEW A. STRATTON

DONALD A. THOMPSON

By: D. Peter Harvey

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

E. & J. Gallo Winery

SIERRA IP GROUP

MARK D. MILLER

ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB

MICHAEL ASCHEN

ANTHONY A. COPPOLA

By: Anthony A. Coppola

Attorneys for Defendants,

Proximo Spirits, Inc., and

Agavera Camichines, S.A. de C.V..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PROXIMO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)