From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winer v. Senior Living Guide, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-934 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)

Summary

denying motion to dismiss where the “spoof” website contained untrue factual statements and falsely indicated it was the plaintiff's official website

Summary of this case from Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-934

03-25-2013

DR. JAMES H. WINER, Plaintiff, v. SENIOR LIVING GUIDE, INC. individually and d/b/a "SLG WEB DESIGN," et al., Defendants.


Judge Cathy Bissoon

Magistrate Judge Mitchell


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On October 9, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On January 17, 2013, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29), recommending that Defendant DePaula's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) be granted with respect to Counts V, X and XI and denied with respect to Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX and XII. The magistrate judge further recommended that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants Patrick DePaula, S.L.G., Inc. and Senior Living Guide, Inc. (Doc. 12) be granted with respect to Counts V, X and XI and denied with respect to Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX and XII. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, Defendants timely filed Objections (Doc. 30) and Plaintiff timely filed an Opposition to Objections (Doc. 31).

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, Objections and Opposition to Objections, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of October 9, 2012 (Doc. 29) is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant DePaula's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED with respect to Counts V, X and XI and DENIED with respect to Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX and XII. In addition, the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants Patrick DePaula, S.L.G., Inc. and Senior Living Guide, Inc. (Doc. 12) is GRANTED with respect to Counts V, X and XI and DENIED with respect to Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX and XII.

_____________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc: All attorneys of record (via CM/ECF e-mail).


Summaries of

Winer v. Senior Living Guide, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-934 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)

denying motion to dismiss where the “spoof” website contained untrue factual statements and falsely indicated it was the plaintiff's official website

Summary of this case from Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer
Case details for

Winer v. Senior Living Guide, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DR. JAMES H. WINER, Plaintiff, v. SENIOR LIVING GUIDE, INC. individually…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-934 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer

While other jurisdictions have found statements on similar “spoof” websites can survive a motion for summary…