Winegard Co. v. Elec. Controlled Sys., Inc.

Full title: WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

484 F. App'x 570 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1282

11-16-2012

WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls), Defendant-Appellant.

ROBERT V.P. WATERMAN, JR., Lane & Waterman LLP, of Davenport, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was APRIL A. MARSHALL. RANDALL T. SKAAR, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of Minnetonka, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was SCOTT G. ULBRICH.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa in case no. 09-CV-0138, Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT V.P. WATERMAN, JR., Lane & Waterman LLP, of Davenport, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was APRIL A. MARSHALL.

RANDALL T. SKAAR, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of Minnetonka, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was SCOTT G. ULBRICH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk