From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windwolf v. Max

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 12, 2013
No. 4:12CV2157 JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4:12CV2157 JAR

02-12-2013

PIAOWAKA C. WINDWOLF, Plaintiff, v. FREDDIE MAX, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. Plaintiff's complaint failed to establish any basis for this Court's jurisdiction, and on January 7, 2013, the Court directed plaintiff to submit an amended complaint establishing subject matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff has submitted two documents with the Court since January 7, 2013; neither of which are a complaint, and neither of which demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction over plaintiff's case. Plaintiff's January 17, 2013, document appears to be something she prepared for bankruptcy court proceedings. And her January 23, 2013, document is a letter to the Court wherein she discusses other actions apparently pending in other courts. As a result, plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's instructions, and failed to demonstrate in any way that this Court has jurisdiction therefore the Court will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order.

___________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Windwolf v. Max

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 12, 2013
No. 4:12CV2157 JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Windwolf v. Max

Case Details

Full title:PIAOWAKA C. WINDWOLF, Plaintiff, v. FREDDIE MAX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

No. 4:12CV2157 JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 12, 2013)