From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1966
193 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 66-449.

December 13, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis J. Christie, J.

Milton R. Wasman and Bernard Cowan, Miami, for appellant.

Paul Sams and John K. Aurell, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.


This interlocutory appeal is from an order of May 11, 1966 which denied the plaintiff's (appellant's) motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing was directed to a previous order of April 1, 1966, which had transferred the cause from Dade County to Pinellas County, Florida, on the grounds of improper venue.

An interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for rehearing does not bring up for appellate review the correctness of other interlocutory orders previously entered in the cause. Taborsky v. Mathews, Fla.App. 1962, 137 So.2d 880; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 73. No error having been demonstrated, we affirm.

Notwithstanding this rule, we have examined the case on its merits and have determined that the order transferring the cause because of improper venue was correct.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1966
193 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:WINDOWMASTER CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. JAMES A. KNOWLES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 13, 1966

Citations

193 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Holzman v. S. Bell Tel. Tel. Co.

Although the notice of appeal was timely as to the order denying rehearing, an appeal from that order does…