From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windhurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 12, 1975
320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1477.

October 3, 1975. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, James M. Reasbeck, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Elliot R. Brooks and Craig Barnard, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Our consideration of the briefs and record convinces us that the appellate points posed for our consideration are without merit. See Richter v. State, 1969, 1 Tenn. Cr.App. 270, 438 S.W.2d 362, 364, and authorities cited therein.

We note however that the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property fails to recite knowledge on the defendant's part of the stolen character of the property. Spurlock v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 281 So.2d 586.

Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Windhurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 12, 1975
320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Windhurst v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CHARLES WINDHURST, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 12, 1975

Citations

320 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Brinson v. State

However, the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property is…