From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windhorst v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals
May 24, 2012
Court of Appeals No. 11CA1045 (Colo. App. May. 24, 2012)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

providing that the insurer receiving medical records did not cure the prejudice because by that time the insurer was defending against claims based on its alleged failure to timely process and pay UIM benefits

Summary of this case from Cribari v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Court of Appeals No. 11CA1045

05-24-2012

Sheila Windhorst, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee.

WEBB

Adams County District Court No. 09CV1216

Honorable Robert W. Kiesnowski, Judge

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED Division IV Opinion by JUDGE WEBB Carparelli and Lichtenstein, JJ., concur NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(f)

Summaries of

Windhorst v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals
May 24, 2012
Court of Appeals No. 11CA1045 (Colo. App. May. 24, 2012)

providing that the insurer receiving medical records did not cure the prejudice because by that time the insurer was defending against claims based on its alleged failure to timely process and pay UIM benefits

Summary of this case from Cribari v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Windhorst v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Sheila Windhorst, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile…

Court:Colorado Court of Appeals

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

Court of Appeals No. 11CA1045 (Colo. App. May. 24, 2012)

Citing Cases

Cribari v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.

The Colorado Court of Appeals, albeit in an unpublished decision, acknowledged this type of prejudice. See…

Cribari v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.

The Colorado Court of Appeals, albeit in an unpublished decision, acknowledged this type of prejudice. See…

3 Citing Cases