From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. Wofford

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 14, 2022
2:18-CV-2656-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-CV-2656-WBS-DMC-P

02-14-2022

SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR., Plaintiff, v. C. WOFFORD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B.SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On December 14, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 38, is granted;

3. All other pending motions, ECF Nos. 39 and 46, are denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Windham v. Wofford

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 14, 2022
2:18-CV-2656-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Windham v. Wofford

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR., Plaintiff, v. C. WOFFORD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 14, 2022

Citations

2:18-CV-2656-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2022)

Citing Cases

Arceo v. City of Roseville

See Lemire v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., 726 F.3d 1062, 1084 (9th Cir. 2013) (finding that corrections…