From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2018
Case No. CV 16-5888-SVW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-5888-SVW (JEM)

03-22-2018

CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. RONALD FRANKLIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked; and (2) Plaintiff is required to furnish the remainder owed of the statutory filing fee of $350 in order to proceed with this action and is admonished that failure to pay the filing fee within thirty days of this Order will result in dismissal of this action. DATED: March 22, 2018

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Windham v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2018
Case No. CV 16-5888-SVW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Windham v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WINDHAM, Plaintiff, v. RONALD FRANKLIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 16-5888-SVW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2018)