From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windeknecht v. Villmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 4, 2015
No. 4:15CV227 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:15CV227 CDP

06-04-2015

LARRY WINDEKNECHT, Petitioner, v. TOM VILLMER, Respondent


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on petitioner's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. He offers various reasons why his petition should not have been dismissed as untimely. His arguments are meritless.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 18] is DENIED.

Dated this 4th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Windeknecht v. Villmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 4, 2015
No. 4:15CV227 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Windeknecht v. Villmer

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WINDEKNECHT, Petitioner, v. TOM VILLMER, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

No. 4:15CV227 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jun. 4, 2015)