The foregoing circumstances are sufficient, however, to sustain the trial court's finding that Trident, Inc. was designated in error and that appellant intended to insure the interests of the operators of the restaurant premises, who proved to be Kingston Trio, Inc., and the conditional vendor or "lessee" which had a security interest in the property. (See Winchester v. General Cab Co. (1936) 13 Cal.App.2d 551, 554-556 [ 57 P.2d 206]; and Goss v. Security Ins. Co. (1931) 113 Cal.App. 577, 579-581 [ 298 P. 860].) [3] Respondent has pointed out: "To constitute a valid contract of insurance the minds of the parties must have met on the identity of the person with whom they are dealing."
Id. at 580-81. Goss was cited in Winchester v. General Cab Co., 13 Cal. App. 2d 551 (2d Dist. 1936). In that case, Mercer Casualty Company issued policy of indemnity that listed as the insured John Coyle, receiver in equity for General Cab Company dba Red Top Cab Company.