Opinion
Nos. 20140112 20140118.
02-12-2015
Adam WINARSKE, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.
Lynn Slaathaug Moen, Mayville, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. James Allen Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Lynn Slaathaug Moen, Mayville, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
James Allen Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Adam Winarske appealed a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Winarske argued he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his guilty pleas were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel at all stages of the proceedings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Winarske's application for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing.
[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.