From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winakor v. Savalle

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 13, 2020
335 Conn. 958 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

10-13-2020

Lee WINAKOR v. Vincent SAVALLE

Paul M. Geraghty, New London, in support of the petition. Patrick J. Markey, in opposition.


Paul M. Geraghty, New London, in support of the petition.

Patrick J. Markey, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 198 Conn. App. 792, 234 A.3d 1122 (2020), is granted limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., did not apply to the defendant's work for the plaintiff?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Winakor v. Savalle

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 13, 2020
335 Conn. 958 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Winakor v. Savalle

Case Details

Full title:Lee WINAKOR v. Vincent SAVALLE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 958 (Conn. 2020)
239 A.3d 319

Citing Cases

Watson Real Estate, LLC v. Woodland Ridge, LLC

(Footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Winakor v. Savalle , 198 Conn. App. 792, 810–11, 234…

Med. Device Sols. v. Aferzon

Because a finding of liability under CUTPA is a necessary prerequisite to an award of attorney's fees under…