From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wimmer v. Tompkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-10

Charles WIMMER, as Director and Officer of United Cable Techs, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Mark TOMPKINS, Directechnologies, LLC, Robert Pine and James Wilde, Defendants–Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 10, 2010. The judgment dismissed plaintiff's causes of action after a nonjury trial.J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. *920 Law Office of Carl J. DePalma, Auburn (Carl J. Depalma of Counsel), for defendants-respondents Directechnologies, LLC, Robert Pine and James Wilde.


Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 10, 2010. The judgment dismissed plaintiff's causes of action after a nonjury trial.J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. *920 Law Office of Carl J. DePalma, Auburn (Carl J. Depalma of Counsel), for defendants-respondents Directechnologies, LLC, Robert Pine and James Wilde.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wimmer v. Tompkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Wimmer v. Tompkins

Case Details

Full title:Charles WIMMER, as Director and Officer of United Cable Techs, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1024
937 N.Y.S.2d 919