From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0908 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-0908 CKD P

07-28-2016

DAVID ROGER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. ///// ///// ///// /////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 14) is denied. Dated: July 28, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/md; wils0908.31


Summaries of

Wilson v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-0908 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Wilson v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROGER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 28, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-0908 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2016)