From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 21, 2024
3:21-cv-82-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2024)

Opinion

3:21-cv-82-DPM

02-21-2024

TERESA WILSON, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. WALMART INC., et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons stated from the bench at the end of the 21 February 2024 hearing, Walmart's motion to dismiss, Doc. 156, is granted for lack of standing with a caveat. Wallace v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 747 F.3d 1025 (8th Cir. 2014). Here's the caveat: the plaintiffs may file a status report identifying the lot numbers of any infant rice cereal that they bought from Walmart. If they can identify those lot numbers, the Court will require Walmart to produce any testing results or certifications from suppliers about that rice cereal. If they cannot, the claims regarding inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs' status report due by 22 March 2024. Walmart must continue to provide status reports on the FDA proceedings as previously ordered in Doc. 139.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 21, 2024
3:21-cv-82-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Wilson v. Walmart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TERESA WILSON, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. WALMART INC., et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 21, 2024

Citations

3:21-cv-82-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 21, 2024)