From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 27, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-386-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 27, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-386-JJB-SCR

08-27-2014

ARTHUR JEROME WILSON (#540407) v. DARRELL VANNOY, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated August 1, 2014 (doc. no. 6). The plaintiff filed an objection which essentially makes the same arguments and has been duly considered by the court.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff's complaints are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 27th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Wilson v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 27, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-386-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 27, 2014)
Case details for

Wilson v. Vannoy

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR JEROME WILSON (#540407) v. DARRELL VANNOY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 27, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-386-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 27, 2014)