From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Nov 5, 2013
No. 1:03-CR-00018-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:03-CR-00018-GZS No. 1:13-CV-00366-GZS

11-05-2013

EASTON WILSON, Movant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 1, 2013, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 820). Movant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 821) on October 15, 2013.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that Movant's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that he may pursue a motion in the First Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to § 2244(b)(3)(A), of he so chooses.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because there is no showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Wilson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Nov 5, 2013
No. 1:03-CR-00018-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:EASTON WILSON, Movant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Nov 5, 2013

Citations

No. 1:03-CR-00018-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 5, 2013)