From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Twitter, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Oct 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-0495 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-0495

10-08-2020

ROBERT EUGENE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court dismiss the complaint, with prejudice (ECF No. 2) and remove this matter from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and DISMISSES the complaint, with prejudice (ECF No. 2) and REMOVES this matter from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: October 8, 2020

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilson v. Twitter, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Oct 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-0495 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Wilson v. Twitter, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EUGENE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 8, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-0495 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)