From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Twitter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2019
Civ. A. No. 18-1610 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2019)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 18-1610

02-11-2019

ROGER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, Defendant



Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2019, after pro se Plaintiff Roger Wilson was granted leave to file his Complaint in forma pauperis, which he filed on January 9, 2019, (Docket No. [3]) seeking $25 billion in damages against Twitter, claiming violations of 42 USC § 2000A and 18 U.S.C. § 73, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge on January 16, 2019, (Docket No. [6]]), recommending that the Complaint be dismissed, with prejudice, as frivolous pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and Plaintiff having failed to file written objections by the established deadline of February 4, 2019, and after conducting a de novo review upon an independent review of the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [6] is adopted as the Opinion of this Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [3] is DISMISSED, with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's separately filed Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal [4] is DENIED;

FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

s/Nora Barry Fischer

Nora Barry Fischer

U.S. District Judge cc/ecf: Roger Wilson

516 Sinclair Street

McKeesport, PA 15132

(via first class mail)


Summaries of

Wilson v. Twitter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2019
Civ. A. No. 18-1610 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Wilson v. Twitter

Case Details

Full title:ROGER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2019

Citations

Civ. A. No. 18-1610 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2019)