From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Nov 20, 2013
No. 122 MM 2013 (Pa. Nov. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. 122 MM 2013 No. 123 MM 2013

11-20-2013

BETH WILSON, Petitioner v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY (EMPLOYER'S INSURANCE COMPANY) AND HONEYWELL, INC. (SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., EMPLOYER), Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2013, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Nov 20, 2013
No. 122 MM 2013 (Pa. Nov. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BETH WILSON, Petitioner v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 20, 2013

Citations

No. 122 MM 2013 (Pa. Nov. 20, 2013)