From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 25, 2021
2:21-cv-0793 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0793 KJN P

08-25-2021

CORNELL EUGENE WILSON, JR., Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, United States Magistrate Judge

Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and paid the filing fee.

Because petitioner may potentially be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within sixty days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application.
2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss; and
3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 25, 2021
2:21-cv-0793 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Wilson v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:CORNELL EUGENE WILSON, JR., Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 25, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0793 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2021)