From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Swiney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:15cv00452 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:15cv00452

05-31-2016

DUSTIN C. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. SWINEY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By order entered May 12, 2016, the court conditionally filed this action and directed Wilson to consent to payment of the filing fee before the court would proceed with his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court advised Wilson that failure to comply with the court's order within ten days would result in dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. Wilson did not respond to the court's order. Inasmuch as the time to respond has passed and Wilson has failed to comply with the court's order, I will dismiss this action without prejudice.

ENTER: This 31st day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

NORMAN K. MOON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilson v. Swiney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:15cv00452 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Wilson v. Swiney

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN C. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. SWINEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:15cv00452 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)