From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Sun Chem.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 10, 2008
No. 02-07-272-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2008)

Opinion

No. 02-07-272-CV

Delivered: January 10, 2008.

Appeal from the 96th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and McCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On December 3, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Sun Chem.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 10, 2008
No. 02-07-272-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Wilson v. Sun Chem.

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE WILSON, APPELLANT v. SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

No. 02-07-272-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2008)