From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Stolman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2006
No. 1:05-cv-00226-OWW-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:05-cv-00226-OWW-SMS-P.

August 25, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 18) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 10) ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL SHALL COUNT AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)


Plaintiff Marcus D. Wilson ("plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 12, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. On July 7, 2006, the court granted plaintiff's second request for an additional thirty days within which to file an objection. More than thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 12, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This action is DISMISSED for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as follows:
a. Plaintiff's due process claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice;
b. Plaintiff's false imprisonment claims under California law are DISMISSED, with prejudice; and,
c. Plaintiff's IIED claim under California law is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and
3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Stolman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2006
No. 1:05-cv-00226-OWW-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Wilson v. Stolman

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS D. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. D. STOLMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 25, 2006

Citations

No. 1:05-cv-00226-OWW-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)