From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 20, 1994
638 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-84.

June 20, 1994.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Bay County; Clinton Foster, Judge.

Kimberly Fitzpatrick Pell of Kimberly Fitzpatrick Pell, Panama City, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The appellant was placed on probation for certain criminal offenses, and he now challenges various conditions of this probation. As in Martin v. State, 618 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), the Bay County Work Program payment must be stricken as there was no statutory authority for this assessment. And because the written orders must conform to the court's oral pronouncement, e.g., Trueblood v. State, 635 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), the monthly First Step payment must be amended to require only a one-time payment. The state concedes error as to these matters, and we reverse the challenged orders in this regard. The orders are otherwise affirmed, and the cause is remanded.

BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 20, 1994
638 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANTHONY WILSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 20, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)