From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Oct 2, 2024
394 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2024-1295

10-02-2024

Richard E. WILSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Richard E. Wilson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

Richard E. Wilson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

Roberts, Kelsey, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Oct 2, 2024
394 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard E. Wilson, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

394 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)