Opinion
WD 85017
01-31-2023
Fentress M. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Kathryn Merwald, Assistant Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Kathryn Merwald, Assistant Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Karen King Mitchell, Judges
Order
Per Curiam: Fentress Wilson appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Wilson raises two points on appeal. First, he argues that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately cross-examine Victim's grandmother with alleged prior inconsistent statements. And, second, he argues that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately cross-examine Victim's grandmother and Victim's mother about the six-day delay between the event at issue and their report to law enforcement. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
All rules references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2021), unless otherwise noted.