From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 28, 1996
669 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

In Wilson this court was analyzing whether the sentence of 55 years in prison as agreed to by the defendant was illegal.

Summary of this case from Bell v. State

Opinion

No. 95-0941.

February 28, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 (a) motion from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Retired Judge.

Farris Wilson, Indiantown, pro se appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


EN BANC


We grant appellee state's Motion for Rehearing En Banc, recognizing that our September 13, 1995, slip opinion is in conflict with our earlier decision in Cayson v. State, 638 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We withdraw the previously issued opinion, and substitute the following:

We reverse the trial court's order denying appellant's second motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 (a). This is so even though appellant filed a previous, unsuccessful 3.800 (a) motion, and despite appellant having agreed to a sentence of 55 years in prison (including a 3-year minimum mandatory) for the offense of second degree murder with a firearm. The sentence was an illegal one, as the offense to which appellant pled is punishable by a term of years not to exceed 40 years, or life in prison.

Under rule 3.800 (a), a motion to correct an illegal sentence can be brought at any time, and even when imposed pursuant to a plea bargain, such a sentence must be vacated upon proper motion. Cayson v. State, 638 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). As in Cayson we hold that on remand, the state should have the option of having the trial court impose a sentence not to exceed 40 years in prison, or vacate the plea and proceed to trial. The state and defendant sought to enter a bargain, but the proposed sentence was an illegal one. The defendant is entitled to be relieved of this illegal sentence, but the state should not then be held to the bargain, unless it accedes to the lesser sentence, or a new [legal] plea bargain can be reached.

GUNTHER, C.J., GLICKSTEIN, DELL, STONE, WARNER, FARMER, KLEIN PARIENTE, STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 28, 1996
669 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

In Wilson this court was analyzing whether the sentence of 55 years in prison as agreed to by the defendant was illegal.

Summary of this case from Bell v. State
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:FARRIS WILSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 28, 1996

Citations

669 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Bell v. State

See id. at 17; see also Hewitt v. State, 689 So.2d 449, 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) ; Robinson v. State, 642…