From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105775

02-20-2018

DeAngelo WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, 1000 Wet Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO. 65203, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Casey A. Taylor, 1000 Wet Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeAngelo Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because there was an insufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea for second-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2016), unless otherwise indicated.
--------

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DeAngelo WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Feb 20, 2018

Citations

540 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)