From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
May 2, 2017
219 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D15–2818

05-02-2017

Rohbanni WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joanna Aurica Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flannigan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joanna Aurica Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flannigan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Rohbanni Wilson challenges his convictions and consecutive sentences for first-degree murder, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm the convictions without discussion, but vacate his sentences because the trial court believed, based on our prior precedent, that it could not exercise discretion in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum terms pursuant to section 775.087(2)(d), Florida Statutes (the 10–20–Life statute). Consistent with our decision in Burns v. State , 212 So.3d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we remand for reconsideration of the sentences in light of Williams v. State , 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016). In so ruling, we certify conflict with Torres–Rios v. State , 205 So.3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), as we did in Burns .

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
May 2, 2017
219 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROHBANNI WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 2, 2017

Citations

219 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Miller v. State

Id. The supreme court did not explicitly discuss a case factually similar to this one, in which appellant…

Jackson v. State

Id. The supreme court did not explicitly discuss a case factually similar to this one, in which appellant…