From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 12, 2015
477 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101216

05-12-2015

Kevin P. Wilson, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Srikant Chigurupati, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Srikant Chigurupati, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kevin P. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment on Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing denying Movant's Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 12, 2015
477 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin P. Wilson, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

477 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)