From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 30, 1996
921 S.W.2d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68691.

April 30, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; HON. TIMOTHY J. PATTERSON, JUDGE.

Gary E. Brotherton, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General and David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 30, 1996
921 S.W.2d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MILLIE M. WILSON, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 30, 1996

Citations

921 S.W.2d 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Wyrick

In contrast, we note the existence of numerous cases which hold that post-execution modification of an…

State v. Haynes

When a sentence pronounced in open court is subsequently modified and the judgment entry reflects the…