From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Priscilla

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2024
LA CV 24-04679-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2024)

Opinion

LA CV 24-04679-VBF-SHK

09-23-2024

CHRISTOPHER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY PRISCILLA et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank Senior United States District Judge

On August 14, 2024, the Court issued an Order (CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) Doc 6) requiring plaintiff to provide additional information in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the case filing fee within thirty days of the date of the order.

The thirtieth calendar day after the Order was Saturday, September 14, 2024. Therefore, the Court treats plaintiff's deadline as falling two days later, on the Court's next business day, Monday, September 16, 2024. The September 16, 2024 deadline elapsed one week ago, and plaintiff has neither provided the additional information to support his IFP request nor paid the filing fee.

The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution, failure to comply with court order, and failure to pay the case filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Priscilla

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2024
LA CV 24-04679-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Wilson v. Priscilla

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER WILSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY PRISCILLA et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2024

Citations

LA CV 24-04679-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2024)