From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Prazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09079

Submitted March 6, 2003.

June 23, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated September 20, 2002, as denied their motion to preclude an expert from testifying at trial.

Caulfield Law Office (Carol R. Finocchio, New York, N.Y. [Lawrence B. Goodman] of counsel), for appellants.

Dalli Marino (John Dalli and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since summary judgment on the merits has been awarded to the defendants in a companion appeal (see Wilson v. Prazza, 306 A.D.2d 466 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2002-07345, decided herewith]), the instant appeal has been rendered academic.

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Prazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Wilson v. Prazza

Case Details

Full title:ICELINE WILSON, ET AL., respondents, v. JOSEPH PRAZZA, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 255

Citing Cases

Carmo v. Verizon

Subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, Nassau County, granted the defendant's…