From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports(US), Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2007
NO. CIV. S-04-633 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-04-633 LKK/CMK.

August 15, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, Byron Chapman, a disabled and wheelchair bound man, sued defendant, Pier 1 Imports store in Vacaville, California, pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. ("ADA"). He also asserted several state law claims. On July 24, 2007, the parties informed the court that the Pier 1 Imports store had ceased doing business and had closed down. A status conference was held in the above captioned case on August 13, 2007. All parties appeared telephonically.

Given that the store at issue in the litigation has closed, there is no longer a live case or controversy under the ADA. Accordingly, this court no longer has jurisdiction to adjudicate the lawsuit. See Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67 (1997) ("To qualify as a case fit for federal-court adjudication, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.") The court further declines to extend supplemental jurisdiction to plaintiff's state law claims.

For these reasons, and the reasons discussed during the status conference, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports(US), Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2007
NO. CIV. S-04-633 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports(US), Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PIER 1 IMPORTS (US), INC; and MELLON/PIER 1…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

NO. CIV. S-04-633 LKK/CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)