From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Nevins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1911
142 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

January, 1911.

Present — Ingraham, P.J. (dissenting), McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.


The judgment should be modified upon respondent's stipulation by deducting $552.30 from the amount recovered, and as modified the judgment and the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.


I dissent upon the ground that there is no evidence to justify a finding that the defendant had constituted his wife as his agent to make the purchases in question. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Nevins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1911
142 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Wilson v. Nevins

Case Details

Full title:JANE WILSON and MARY WILSON, Respondents, v . THOMAS A. NEVINS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1911

Citations

142 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)