From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Mercado

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 24, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2667-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2667-MCE-CMK-P.

January 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel (Docs. 25 and 28). The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's requests for the appointment of counsel (Docs. 25 and 28) are denied.

DATED: January 21, 2011


Summaries of

Wilson v. Mercado

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 24, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2667-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Wilson v. Mercado

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE R. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. N. MERCADO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2667-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2011)