From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0721 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0721 JAM JFM (PC).

August 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2011, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendant Clark's motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff be granted leave to file an amended complaint. After adoption of the findings and recommendations by the Honorable John A. Mendez, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The court has reviewed the amended complaint and finds that it states a claim against defendants Lopez, Diaz and Clark. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Clark is directed to respond to the First Amended Complaint within twenty-one days of the date of this order.

Defendants Lopez and Diaz filed an Answer on December 17, 2010.

DATED: August 23, 2011.


Summaries of

Wilson v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0721 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Wilson v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:GERALD WILSON, Plaintiff, v. M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0721 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)