From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Marcus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2013
104 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-7

In re Jeffrey WILSON, Petitioner, v. Hon. Martin MARCUS, etc., et al., Respondents.

Jeffrey Wilson, petitioner pro se. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jason S. Whitehead of counsel), for Newton Mendys, respondent.


Jeffrey Wilson, petitioner pro se. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jason S. Whitehead of counsel), for Newton Mendys, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding that the claims raised in the petition are not cognizable in this article 78 proceeding,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on November 13, 2012 is hereby recalled and vacated ( see M–5938, 2013 WL 828242, decided simultaneously herewith).

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Marcus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2013
104 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. Marcus

Case Details

Full title:In re Jeffrey WILSON, Petitioner, v. Hon. Martin MARCUS, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1459
960 N.Y.S.2d 899