From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Legum Norman Midwest 33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2015
Case No. 15 C 1638 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 15 C 1638

03-25-2015

THOMAS WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LEGUM NORMAN MIDWEST 33 West Ontario Street Chicago, IL 60610, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court's current printout of a Motions Report -- a report that reflects all motions considered as pending in cases assigned to its calendar -- includes Dkt. 11 in this action, which is listed as the application by plaintiff Thomas Wilson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("Application"). Although that listing is literally accurate -- Wilson has indeed filed such an Application -- it is not accurate in real world terms, because Wilson has already paid the $400 filing fee. Instead the Application is really a corollary to Wilson's effort to obtain attorney representation, an effort that this Court could not entertain because of his failure to report any efforts to retain counsel on his own (a requirement that our Court of Appeals imposes as a precondition to considering any designation of counsel to act pro bono publico). Accordingly the Application [Dkt. 11] is denied, a denial that does not bear adversely on the unresolved ultimate issue of pro bono representation by counsel.

/s/_________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge
Date: March 25, 2015


Summaries of

Wilson v. Legum Norman Midwest 33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 25, 2015
Case No. 15 C 1638 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Wilson v. Legum Norman Midwest 33

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LEGUM NORMAN MIDWEST 33 West Ontario Street…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

Case No. 15 C 1638 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2015)