From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Lamanna

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2022
21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW)

07-29-2022

MARCUS WILSON, Plaintiff, v. AMY LAMANNA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court has reviewed pro se Petitioner's request for a phone conference (ECF 20), and Defendants' letter in response. (ECF 22).

Pro se Petitioner seeks an emergency phone conference (ECF 20) because he received a copy of Defendants' request for an extension of time to answer Petitioner's habeas petition (ECF 18) that improperly included a different case caption. In a letter dated July 21, 2022, Defendants apologized for including the wrong case caption in their letter and mailed a copy of the corrected letter to Petitioner. (ECF 22).

Accordingly, Petitioner's request for a phone conference is DENIED as moot.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Lamanna

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2022
21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Wilson v. Lamanna

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WILSON, Plaintiff, v. AMY LAMANNA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)