From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. King

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Apr 13, 2022
1:22CV226 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:22CV226

04-13-2022

NATHAN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PAUL KING, Defendant.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs, United States District Judge

The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 4, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed a document which the Court construes as an objection to the Recommendation. (See ECF No. 6.)

The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, or alternatively, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Wilson v. King

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Apr 13, 2022
1:22CV226 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Wilson v. King

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. PAUL KING, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 13, 2022

Citations

1:22CV226 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2022)