From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-301-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-301-JWD-EWD

05-23-2019

CORNELIUS LORENZO WILSON (#356241) v. TIMOTHY HOOPER, ET AL.


RULING

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification (R. Doc. 7), in which Plaintiff requests that this Court clarify whether Plaintiff's dismissal was with or without prejudice. This Court declines to clarify the Ruling (R. Doc. 6) that is the subject of the Motion. However, the Court does notify Plaintiff that the effect of a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) is as follows: "[u]nless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state-court action based on or including the same claim, a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification (R. Doc. 7) be and is hereby DENIED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on May 23, 2019.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Wilson v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-301-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Wilson v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS LORENZO WILSON (#356241) v. TIMOTHY HOOPER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 23, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-301-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. May. 23, 2019)