From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 7, 2024
CIVIL 3:22-cv-0610 (M.D. Pa. May. 7, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:22-cv-0610

05-07-2024

STEPHEN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY, Defendant.


ORDER

Sylvia H. Rambo Judge

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2024, upon consideration of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 5) which recommends that the instant action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction over the named defendant, and noting that no objections have been filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 7, 2024
CIVIL 3:22-cv-0610 (M.D. Pa. May. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Wilson v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 7, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 3:22-cv-0610 (M.D. Pa. May. 7, 2024)