concluding that loss of inmate's canteen privileges for thirty days violated no liberty interest and did not give rise to constitutional due process protections
Summary of this case from Howell v. O'MalleyNo. 09-P-2256.
February 7, 2011.
DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
concluding that loss of inmate's canteen privileges for thirty days violated no liberty interest and did not give rise to constitutional due process protections
Summary of this case from Howell v. O'MalleyFull title:DOUGLAS WILSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION others
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Feb 7, 2011
It is well established that the disciplinary sanctions underlying Howell's deprivation of due process claim -…