From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Clallam Cnty. PUD Dist #1

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 17, 2023
3:23-CV-5203-RSL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 17, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CV-5203-RSL

03-17-2023

BRENT ARTHUR WILSON, Plaintiff, v. CLALLAM COUNTY PUD DIST #1, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

DAVID W. CHRISTEL, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $402 filing fee, Plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff's IFP application (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. However, based on the allegations in the proposed complaint, it is unclear if Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the District Judge assigned to this case.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Clallam Cnty. PUD Dist #1

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 17, 2023
3:23-CV-5203-RSL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Wilson v. Clallam Cnty. PUD Dist #1

Case Details

Full title:BRENT ARTHUR WILSON, Plaintiff, v. CLALLAM COUNTY PUD DIST #1, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 17, 2023

Citations

3:23-CV-5203-RSL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 17, 2023)